Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
Now ... nobody's gonna bring up the Zionist conspiracy angle? Braun, Green ... coincidence? C'mon! WAKE UP PEOPLE! I bet the Rothschilds were slipping PEDs to Hank Greenberg.
Suing Jack Clark is probably roughly equivalent to suing Lenny Dykstra. Even if you win, what are you going to get?
Pujols will not only have to show that the statements were false, he'll also have to show they were made with actual malice.
He (Dale Murphy) has to take a back seat to these creeps and lowlifes like (Mark) McGwire.
If Roger Clemens hadn't sued, his reputation would have taken an irreparable hit from the media.
Now, let's switch out Pujols with McGwire. If McGwire had never tested positive or admitted he used, would a suit by McGwire against Clark have legs? It seems like the "creeps and lowlifes" wording could be construed as malicious. No?
Gee, if you ask me, it took a way bigger hit than if he had just denied it and done nothing else. For instance, the Mindy McCready story may never have surfaced.
But in all other situations, he always tells the truth.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (1 members)
Page rendered in 0.3285 seconds, 58 querie(s) executed