Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 4 pages
John Manuel thinks the RPI is biased against Western teams.
Bloomington: Indiana, Austin Peay, Florida, Valparaiso
All the changes are trying to do is to quantify something that everyone already knows, namely that it is harder to win a road game than a neutral site game and it is harder to win a neutral site game than a home game. Without looking into it too deeply, I can see arguing that the adjustment they are making is incorrect (I've made that argument about the basketball RPI for a long time), but surely everyone ought to be able to agree that there should be some adjustment for home games versus road games.
Hopefully they can even win a game this time.
- the Cardinals, for example, played midweek games at Indiana and Kentucky, both of which were top-50 RPI, plus at Ohio State which was top-100.
All of which are easier for Louisville than playing a road game against all but one Big East rival.
Woo-hoo! Go Crusaders!! Second year in a row in the tourney for my alma mater. Hopefully they can even win a game this time.
Mid-American: Bowling Green
Isn't the simplest argument that the RPI is biased against the west that other measures which better correlate w performance hold the west in higher esteem?
I assume you guys are familiar with boydsworld.com; a college baseball site.
The Towson as a #3 seed thing still just blows my mind.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (0 members)
Page rendered in 0.6464 seconds, 73 querie(s) executed