Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I like Jonah and wasn't super happy with the results this year, but there isn't anything in here indicating that the process is flawed
Keith Law is re-tweeting some interesting tweets from fellow baseball writers.
This was his original tweet:
"keithlaw ?@keithlaw 8min
If you're a HOF voter and voted for ten guys, but omitted Biggio due to lack of space, please speak up. It will help push ballot reform."
Two answers/RTs as of now:
"Rob Maaddi ?@RobMaaddi 15min
Craig Biggio missed Hall of Fame by 2 votes. I didn't vote him b/c 10 is max. He was 11 on my ballot. Time for BBWAA to change max rules?"
"Jon Becker ?@JonBecker28 7min
@KeithLaw I voted 10 and took Biggio off at last minute for Walker. Ugh! I would have voted for 14 guys this year."
Over 75% of the voters believe Craig Biggio should be in the Hall of Fame. The standard for election is 75%. But Craig Biggio is not in the Hall of Fame. That's a flaw in the process.
mussina's foundation is actually pretty good. given all factors 20 percent for a first year candidate on a 'loaded' ballot strikes me as a good start
Absolutely. And the best thing Mussina has going for him is the same thing Bert and Jack did - no more attractive starting pitching candidates coming up after him (once Pedro and Randy go in next year). I see Schilling and Mussina* performing similarly to Jack and Bert, but starting from a much better place (his vote total may not show it, though I think that's a result of the crowding, not his true baseline support).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (3 members)
Page rendered in 0.4468 seconds, 73 querie(s) executed