Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
in making a preliminary ruling on the “admissibility” of a candidates’ purported PED use, this proposal would assure that all voters consider the same information before voting
The HOF has no reason to even pry open any such box of worms.
Am I reason his correctly? Are thy arguing that confession of pre-2004 use (McGwire) can be used to keep you out, but not failing a pre-2004 drug test? How does this make sense?
To hold the character clause against Bonds -- and the character clause is the only argument for keeping out pre-testing PED users -- requires believing that Bonds knowingly used PEDs.
But when you conclude with, "Nothing to be done", well, the Hall needs to do something to get its house in order. Some instruction, some guidance to the voters.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (1 members)
Page rendered in 0.9254 seconds, 73 querie(s) executed